Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Analysis of the early response to chemotherapy in lung cancer using apparent diffusion coefficient single-slice histogram

Jianxing Xu1, Jiangang Zheng2, Zhengyang Zhou1, Xiao Han3

1Department of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166; 2Department of Radiology, Affiliated Wujin Hospital of Jiangsu University, Changzhou 213000; 3Key Laboratory of Human Functional Genomics of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.

For correspondence:-  Xiao Han   Email: hanxjsh@163.com   Tel:+862586869425

Accepted: 17 March 2018        Published: 30 April 2018

Citation: Xu J, Zheng J, Zhou Z, Han X. Analysis of the early response to chemotherapy in lung cancer using apparent diffusion coefficient single-slice histogram. Trop J Pharm Res 2018; 17(4):681-686 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v17i4.17

© 2018 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the application of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using single-slice histogram analysis to study the chemotherapy responses in lung cancer.
Methods: A total of 22 chemotherapy patients with advanced lung cancer from the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (Nanjing, China) were included in the study. We obtained DWI before and during chemotherapy, performed single-slice histogram analysis of ADC values, and assessed responses after 3 months of chemotherapy. Differences in ADC histogram parameters were compared between the responder and non-responder groups.
Results: After therapy, we classified 13 as responders and 9 patients as non-responders. The recorded peak ADC value (ADCpeak) and lowest ADC value (ADClowest) did not show any significant difference in baseline ADClowest and ADCpeak between responders and non-responders. After chemotherapy, 13 responders had significant increase in ADClowest and ADCpeak compared with pre-treatment values (p < 0.001). ADClowest significantly increased in 9 non-responders (p < 0.05), although ADCpeak did not significantly increase. ADCpeak changes were significantly larger in the responder group than in the non-responder group (p = 0.024). ADClowest changes after treatment were larger in the responder group than in the non-responder group, though not significantly.
Conclusion: ADC values derived from single-slice histogram analysis may provide a useful and clinically feasible method for monitoring early chemotherapy response in patients with lung cancer.

Keywords: Lung cancer, Chemotherapy, Apparent diffusion coefficient values, Diffusion-weighted imaging, Single-slice histogram analysis

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates